The use of
technology in the classroom is drastically different from when I was going to
school. We did not have a Chromebook for every student, flash drives, smart
phones, touch screen computers, or I-Pads. Technology has advanced quickly over
the years but teachers are keeping up.
As educational
leaders, it is our responsibility to ensure teachers are integrating technology
into the classroom. Some make the argument that there are teachers that are too
old to use technology in the classroom. This statement is just not true; any
one can learn to use new technology in their classroom. Other would make the
argument that people are unwilling to learn to use new technology. As an
educational leader we should be inspiring our teachers to utilize technology in
the classroom.
As educational
leaders we should not get caught up with exactly what kind of technology our
teachers and students are utilizing. We should be pushing for the integration
of technology that best suites the teachers teaching style, the course content
and the students. Currently there are many different apps and programs that do
similar activities. Students can utilize the same apps, programs and online
content from any computer, laptop, tablet or smart phone. The device, the apps
and the programs do not matter anymore. There are so many apps and programs
with similar functions and uses. Teachers should be encouraged to choose the
one that bests fits their teaching style, the content being taught and the
students.
Educational
leaders should be modeling the SAMR model for integrating technology. The S
stands for substitution. Meaning technology is being used as a tool to
substitute as a better way of doing a task. For instance writing an essay in
Google Docs instead of hand writing the essay on a piece of loose leaf paper
would be an example of substitution.
The A in SAMR
stands for augmentation. Meaning the use of the technology has resulted in simplifying
the task. For instance sharing an essay
via Google Docs for peers to critique instead of handing them an essay on a
piece of loose leaf paper would be an example of augmentation. This would be
augmentation since the peer evaluation will be easier since each person can
view the document at the same time and even from different locations. Each
student does not have to crowd around a single loose leaf paper to read the
essay.
The M in SAMR represents
modification. Modification means the technology has changed the way of doing
the task. For instance when leaving comments during a peer review students
would write comments in the margins or on another piece of paper. When using
Google docs, students and teachers can leave comments by marking locations in
the leave a comment and a window pops up for the peer or teacher to leave a
comment, this would be an example of a modification.
The R in SAMR
stands for redefinition. Redefinition would be completing an essay in a whole
new way. For instance the students may create a video to present the
information from the essay. Students could use a platform like Flipgrid.com to
create a video presenting their essay and then students can critique or comment
on the video by leaving a video response.
The SAMR model for
technology integration should be in every educational leaders’ tool box. The
SAMR model is a perfect tool to evaluate technology integration. Technology has
advanced quickly over the years and the SAMR model is one way to ensure we are
staying current in our schools.
References:
Hamilton, E.R., Rosenberg, J.M.,
& Akcaoglu, M. (2016), The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: a critical
review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends,
60, 433-441.
No comments:
Post a Comment